Moab Man

By Jennifer Gianetti

Lin Ottinger and the discovery of the 1971 bones

Discovery

What is the Moab Man?

The Moab Man refers to the discovery of several human remains in the Keystone Azurite Mine, a mine located near Moab, Utah . At least six different human skeletons were found; they were stained blue-green from the mineral known as Malachite. Scholars theorize the bones were either the product of a cave in, or a burial ceremony of the ancestral 6th and 7th century A.D. Puebloan people. Unfortunately, the original placement of the remains was disrupted by bulldozer activity. This made it difficult for archaeologists working the case to identify the stratigraphic and cultural context of the bones .

Who are Lin Ottinger and Jack Marwitt?

Lin Ottinger is known as a local celebrity of Moab, Utah; in 1960, he opened up a rock shop located on Main Street. As the owner of Lin Ottinger's Moab Rock Shop, Ottinger sells rocks and arrowheads to the tourists that visit Moab each year . His shop doubles as a museum, housing dinosaur bones, petrified wood, fossils, and the malachite-covered remains found in the Keystone Azurite Mine. In addition to owning and operating his Moab Rock Shop, Lin Ottinger took groups on tours around the Canyonland National Park until 1980, when he decided to retire from the touring business .

[[File:Lin_And_Tour_Bus.jpg|thumb|400px|Lin Ottinger and his tour bus, before he stopped taking tours. The stone, which is widely thought to have been mined from 350 to 500 A.D. , could be found in Mesoamerica and the Southwest. It is an extremely fragile stone, meaning the slightest scratch or change in temperature can shatter or chip it .

The fragile nature of the stone was found to be exceptionally useful when painting with pigments. The people of these prehistoric times, specifically located in Mesoamerica and the Southwest, would grind malachite into dry pigment to use on many forms of artwork. Occasionally, azurite and malachite would be combined to create a new pigmentation. Additionally, the stunning stone was utilized as a form of jewelry. Although, this was a rare occasion, as stones like turquoise were found more often than malachite and other copper stones .

Pseudoarchaeological Narrative

Creationist Perspective

Creationists began making absurd claims after the initial discovery of the bones. Similar themes are found to be repeated throughout most of these claims. There are four most recognized: Don Patton, Dave Rudd, Fran Barnes, and Clifford Burdick . The first story published was by Fran Barnes in 1971 in The Times-Independent. His article claimed that the remains must be 100 million years old because they were found in Dakota Sandstone, which is 100 million years old . This article prompted fellow creationists to take his ideologists a step further. A 1973 publication of Creation Research Society Quarterly contained an article written by Clifford Burdick. Within the article, Burdick used facts from Marwitt's excavations, altering Marwitt's words and actions for his own beliefs. He stated the remains were undisturbed, joined together, and green from the mineral Malachite. Furthermore, his article claimed the location of the findings did not support the possibility of the ancient humans being buried in a cave. Burdick's article exploited the end of Marwitt's career. He claimed Marwitt gave the bones to Lin Ottinger, but there is no evidence to support this claim; Burdick uses the age of Dakota Sandstone to insinuate that was the actual reason he "gave the bones back to Ottinger" .

Creationists Don Patton and Dave Rudd are accredited with creating the Official World Site Malachite Man. Patton, who attended some of the early 1990 excavations, attribute the burials as being caused by Noah's Flood. Patton and Rudd blatantly disregard facts about the site and excavations, creating their own narrative that other creationists have supported. They claim ten modern humans (men, women, and children), coated partly in malachite, were found buried 50 feet deep. They inferred that the humans could not have been miners because women and children were unlikely to be working in a mine . According to Patton and Rudd, there were no tools found at the site, and the event that killed the humans was unlikely to be a cave in because the bones were intact. To help their elaborate story, they interviewed a bulldoze driver who had previously worked on the site, before the initial discoveries. He is quoted claiming there were "no tunnels or cracks in the extremely hard overlying layers of rock" . The nature of this statement led them to believe these bones and dinosaurs were buried by the same widespread event, meaning modern humans must have been alive at the same time as dinosaurs.

Archaeological Perspective

Fran Barnes article, titled The Case of the Bones in Stone, claims the bones found in 1971 were trapped in a rock formation, in situ (or, in its original place) . Marwitt's notes, as well as a latter sent by him, confirm that the bones were NOT located in situ . The remains were, however, located in a loose arrangement of sand and rocks . If the bones were in situ, they would be the same age as the surrounding stone (Dakota Sandstone, which is 100 million years old ). Marwitt's confirmation allows archaeologists to disregard Barnes' claims that the remains must be 100 million years old. His disregard for fact is obvious once the entire excavation process and field notes are observed.

As stated above, the Official World Site Malachite Man is fictitious. It creates its own timeline to support wide-spread ideologies about when the 'creation' of modern humans occurred, and the phenomena known as "Noah's Flood". In order to support these beliefs, the creationists responsible for the website utilize two specific characteristics of the find: the Moab Man remains, and the context in which they were supposedly found . For example, they site a bulldoze driver, who they claim was the one to make the initial 1971 discovery. The driver states there were no tunnels or cracks in the rock surrounding area . Both of these statements are simply untrue. According to the 1971 field notes by Jack Marwitt , Lin Ottinger came across the remains while searching for azurite nuggets. The 1995 Utah Archaeology article mentions bulldozer activity from previous mining, but Coulam and Schroedl (who reviewed and paraphrased the original field notes by Marwitt) do not discuss a bulldoze driver being the one to make the first discovery. Moreover, during a visit to the Keystone Azurite Mine in 1995, Schroedl and Coulam were shown the entrance to a small mining tunnel by Harrison (current owner of the mine), which was located about 7 meters north of the 1990 discoveries. This mine entrance is physical evidence of the inconsistencies in Patton and Rudd's writings . Additionally, Patton and Rudd claim the remains were articulated fossils, or were subject to rapid fossilization . Marwitt's 1971 field notes specifically state that the bones were fragile in nature and slightly mineralized, but they were not fossils .